Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nyiostergotland 2010 en.pdf
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
File:Nyiostergotland_2010_en.pdf[edit]
see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nyiostergotland 2010 ar.pdf Antemister (talk) 19:10, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
Keep I uploaded these files. They constitute a parallel corpus in eight languages with basic information about Sweden for immigrants. It is true that they are text PDFs, but they are still educational and useful as sources both for information about Sweden and for translation of terms about Sweden. --LA2 (talk) 21:41, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
Kept: per the undeletion request for Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nyiostergotland 2010 ar.pdf Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:49, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 11:21, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
- Keep per LA2 last time. Please do not make such nominations without new arguments. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 12:20, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
- Apart from the fact that there is no evidence of permission (please consider that to be the desired new argument), there is no reason to have such a document as a pdf file. If the content would be in scope, it would belong to a Wikipedia article instead. Ices2Csharp (talk) 14:43, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
- That is silly; at least 95 % of the files on Commons is not in use in a Wikipedia article. As to permission, LA2 (en:Lars Aronsson) wrote: "No copyright applies, neither to the original text nor translations, according to e-mail from site maintainer Pontus Karlbom on June 30, 2010." /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 22:47, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
- Apart from the fact that there is no evidence of permission (please consider that to be the desired new argument), there is no reason to have such a document as a pdf file. If the content would be in scope, it would belong to a Wikipedia article instead. Ices2Csharp (talk) 14:43, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
Kept Copy the content in a adequate project and request the deletion again Ezarateesteban 18:57, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
Apparently, the file has disappeared now, without new discussion, but with this log message:
05:30, 7 September 2012 Fastily (talk | contribs) deleted page File:Nyiostergotland 2010 en.pdf (Out of project scope)