User talk:Artanisen

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Artanisen!

Archives: Archives 1, Archives 2

File:IJN Aircraft Carrier Taiho.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cléééston (talk) 22:26, 14 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I agree with the deletion since it is apparently a photo of a miniature model ship, not the full sized ship. See here and here. It was previously uploaded here. -23:00, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Soba-Noodles-Deliveryman-Tokyo-1935.png, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Soba-Noodles-Deliveryman-Tokyo-1935.png. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 8 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

Paul_012 (talk) 04:13, 17 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hello, the original uploader of the first image is Sturmvogel 66 on 12 April 2015. Please ask him for details about the image. -Artanisen (talk) 05:00, 18 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
File:JMSDF Special Boarding Unit Insignia.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 19:06, 3 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]



File:Nakano-Takeko-Portrait-Hokaiji-Temple-Kyoto.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Isaac Rabinovitch (talk) 19:18, 26 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

通し矢の浮世絵の件( File:Toshi-ya 00.jpg )[edit]

artanisen様が更新されたFile:Toshi-ya 00.jpgですが、当初の浮世絵は「浮繪和國景跡京都三拾三軒堂之図」でしたが、更新されたものは「御江戸深川」の三十三間堂図となっています。 本家の京都三十三間堂を模して、江戸にも三十三間堂が作られましたが(「江戸三十三間堂」の記事を参照下さい)、「三拾三軒堂之図」の浮世絵について、同じ構図で(版を繰りまわして)京都版と江戸版があります。artanisen様が江戸版の浮世絵で更新してしまったため、Wikipedia の説明書と不整合が生じています。 Kyoto history (talk) 11:46, 2 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Kyoto historyさん、説明してくれて、ありがとうございます。 画像は以前のバージョンに戻しました。- Artanisen (talk) 02:26, 3 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Vice Admiral Kantaro Suzuki c1917.png[edit]

asturianu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  euskara  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Vice Admiral Kantaro Suzuki c1917.png, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Vice Admiral Kantaro Suzuki c1917.png]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

eien20 (talk) 06:51, 18 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, the source is "East Hall blog - https://web.archive.org/save/http://easthall.blog.jp/archives/31532108.html ". I don't know where they got the photo from, but it was made in 1917. "This photograph is in the public domain in Japan because its copyright has expired according to Article 23 of the 1899 Copyright Act of Japan ... It was published before January 1, 1957. It was photographed before January 1, 1947." -Artanisen (talk) 09:56, 18 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
File:Queen-Himiko-Museum-Yayoi-Culture.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Nnkrkrhhdi (talk) 10:45, 11 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:AmsterdamLuchtfotoBmz.jpg is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:

This file is an exact duplicate or scaled-down version of File:Amsterdam airphoto.jpg.

If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.

If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead.

العربية  Deutsch  English  español  français  Bahasa Indonesia  日本語  português  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−

  — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 11:36, 12 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Statue-of-Date-Masamune-in-Aobayama-Park-Sendai-2016.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Nnkrkrhhdi (talk) 02:12, 13 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This file has been restored. It seems that the file was used in each language version of Wikipedia, but it has been removed from the article because it was deleted once. I don't know where the article is, so if you don't mind, please post the image again. Y.haruo (talk) 22:45, 11 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks Y.haruo san, I will check it and see if it can be restored in the articles. -Artanisen (talk)
@Y.haruo: I've restored the image on a few articles. It was previously removed by CommonsDelinker. If you want to you can restore it on the Japanese article, because you are a native speaker and can best answer questions about it. -Artanisen (talk) 04:22, 14 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thank you for your prompt response to my request. It seems that the Japanese wikipedia article used another photo of the same statue instead of this photo, but it seems that there is no problem because it was not deleted. Y.haruo (talk) 23:53, 14 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 04:30, 4 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, did you (mostly) write the description or did you (mostly) copy it from [1]? If it's the latter, we might need to delete it because the text doesn't seem to be licensed under CC BY-SA. (It's possible to delete the text description without deleting the image.) whym (talk) 09:43, 8 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, the description is from that website. It can be shortened. It's important to keep the part that the painter (Ishikawa Shizumasa) personally knew Saigo and that the painting is therefore one of the most accurate depictions of Takamori. -Artanisen (talk) 10:25, 8 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Yes, you can replace it with a minimal summary and link the website for a full description. Note also that the translations added later have the same problem. I would keep the summary factual and neutral, like "Osaka City Museum claims this/the painter to be X and Y". The "therefore one of the most accurate" part sounds like an opinion rather than a fact. Anyway, we can edit it as much as we want later, after the deletion is requested and done. (By deletion, I mean deletion done by sysop, not just removal.) whym (talk) 03:05, 10 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Yes, I've adjusted the descriptions to a minimum which is fair use. -Artanisen (talk) 06:42, 10 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thanks Artanisen, I've hidden the revisions with the extended text from the source link. --AFBorchert (talk) 22:01, 12 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@AFBorchert Thank you for your help. If you don't mind, I think there are more revisions to be hidden - specifically it started in the link I gave earlier. (It was Artanisen's first edit to that page.) whym (talk) 03:44, 13 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Whym: Thank you for pointing this out. I've now hidden the whole range. Regards, AFBorchert (talk) 06:20, 13 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, I uploaded the whole atlas. Yann (talk) 15:11, 15 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Good work, thank you Yann. -Artanisen (talk) 15:20, 15 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Category:Staatse vloot is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:

CSD C2 (unuseful empty category)

If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.

If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead.

العربية  Deutsch  English  español  français  Bahasa Indonesia  日本語  português  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−

R'n'B (talk) 13:04, 2 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Toyohiro-Akiyama-First-Japanese-in-Space-Portrait.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Marcus Cyron (talk) 04:59, 14 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Susanoo rescues Kushinada Hime by Toyohara Chikanobu 1886.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

eien20 (talk) 07:31, 1 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]