User talk:Sebastian Wallroth

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Fotos von Köln[edit]

Hallo Sebastian, Du hast vorgestern einen ganzen Schwung Fotos von Köln hochgeladen, die leider nur der Kategorie "Cologne" zugeordnet sind. Beim Kategorisieren ist mir aufgefallen, dass die Bilder vermutlich allesamt bereits vorhanden sind, Du hattest sie nach der WikiCon-Fotoexkursion 2014 schon hochgeladen. Ich habe jetzt eigentlich die Lust verloren, auch die Duplikate zu kategorisieren - könntest Du das übernehmen, oder aber sie löschen lassen (was meiner Meinung nach die bessere Möglichkeit wäre)? - Danke! Till (talk) 06:58, 20 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi @Till, vielen Dank für den Hinweis. Ich hatte nur flüchtig untersucht, ob ich die Bilder schon hochgeladen hatte und mich auf die Warnung für Duplikaten beim Hochladen verlassen. Das scheint aber nicht mehr zu funktionieren? Vielen Dank nochmals, --Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 07:09, 20 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Bisher kenne ich nur eine Warnung bzw. Fehlermeldung beim Hochladen, wenn eine Datei mit demselben Namen bereits vorhanden ist. Du hast aber andere Namen gewählt als 2014. Soll es auch einen Check auf inhaltliche Übereinstimmung geben? - Das wäre mir neu, wäre aber eine praktische Einrichtung. Till (talk) 07:57, 20 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Ich habe es gerade geprüft: Wenn man eine Datei von Commons herunterlädt und versucht, sie unter einem anderen Namen hochzuladen, bekommt man die Warnung: "Diese Datei ist ein Duplikat der folgenden Dateien:". Ob es nur Dateigröße und Dateiabmessungen prüft, weiß ich nicht. Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 08:19, 20 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

holly {chat} 21:20, 23 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Logo YC Adtraction1 300x100.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Gnomingstuff (talk) 06:05, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Vava. Onana.jpg[edit]

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Vava. Onana.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Adeletron 3030 (talk) 02:40, 28 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Brigadier Hernández Martínez.jpg[edit]

asturianu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  euskara  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Brigadier Hernández Martínez.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Taichi (talk) 07:34, 28 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:LiNear Logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Gnomingstuff (talk) 05:54, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]